Hailey Hexdrix: For long-term, I’ll gladly be a geek
5 months ago | 558 views | 17 17 comments | 16 16 recommendations | email to a friend | print
I want to be a geek. I mean right now, most everywhere, geeks are looked at as outcasts, the undesired rejects of society. But in a few years, every brat littering their high school today, who spends their four major school years traumatizing the less popular breed of people cluttering the halls, will wish they’d been defined as a “geek.”

At this time, being called a geek is an insult, but as time wanders on, the term becomes less and less insulting. In the long run, geeks will be raking in the big bucks, while the same narrow-minded jerks that laughed at them in school will be mastering the phrase, “Would you like fries with that?”

The very things that seem to make these people “cool” are their partying ways and blasé attitude to any and all things involving school work; so wouldn’t mediocre jobs and a medium wage salary be the most expected outcome? How can drinking underage and harassing innocent kids broaden your scholastic horizons?

The majority of the bullies are jocks who assume they will go places with football and/or basketball. But the cold, hard truth is only a very slim percentage of the people who aspire to go pro actually make it. And when you fail to have a backup plan, where does that land you? Working at a fast-food restaurant for the rest of your life, the only goal you have left achieving a manger position? Though this wouldn’t stop some from having a fulfilling life, it will definitely fall short when your previous objective was to play a sport that you loved professionally.

Webster’s Dictionary defines a geek as a “person who has chosen concentration rather than conformity; one who pursues skill (especially technical skill) and imagination, not mainstream social acceptance.” Well, those who work with computers and such are in high demand, especially in this rapidly transforming day and age. It would be incomparably blissful to not care about being accepted and care only about being yourself! Kids can be cruel and spiteful, and not just in school, but life in general would be so much easier if we we’re capable of simply not caring.

Four years of being perceived as an outsider to the “normal” slacking student body seems well worth the trade-off. Having fun and blowing off your studies might be what makes you intriguing to others in high school, but later in life being capable of carrying on an intellectual conversation and holding down a job is of way more importance.

So yes, I want to be a geek, and I want to be able to genuinely not care about the nasty things people might say about me. Maybe one day, hopefully sooner rather than later, I will hear someone whisper the word “geek” with my name laced into the sentence.

Teen View columnist Hailey Hendrix is a sophomore at High Point Central High School.
comments (17)
« mike27282 wrote on Friday, Mar 05 at 10:32 PM »
Yeah, engineers are not creative, and liberals are brilliant!

http://syynlabs.com/

http://syynlabs.com/about

Wish I saw this sooner.

« CLH wrote on Tuesday, Mar 02 at 05:03 PM »
Again, Google "Salem Hypothesis".

Angry Mike is Angry.
« menyambal-is-a-idiot wrote on Tuesday, Mar 02 at 04:12 PM »
That's the stupidest description of an engineer than I've ever seen. Menyambal is obviously a fool.

« anonymous wrote on Monday, Mar 01 at 07:12 PM »
Quote from "Menyambal", an engineer:

"Engineers, by and large, are very much hands-on, not abstract theorists. Where they differ from automobile mechanics, say, is that they understand the concepts behind the mechanisms, and can develop variations on mechanical devices. But that understanding is mathematical, in a way, it is not intuitive or creative. It is, frankly, simplistic.

An engineer is also provincial, in that an engineer is proud of what he knows, and somewhat contemptuous of those who don't know what he knows. (Factories are full of people with similar attitudes--they took five years to learn to run a machine, they can run only that machine, and they demean beginners for their lack of skill.)

Even though an engineer works in a strictly mechanistic world, and seems to work from a non-theistic basis, he doesn't truly understand the world, and superstition and fashion influence his work a great deal more than he knows, and his people skills suck.

So when an engineer sets out to understand the universe, he is immediately out of his depth, but has sufficient arrogance to go on, anyhow. He is also pre-wired to accept the simplest explanation, and lacks the critical skills to evaluate the entire theory, and quite willing to condemn people.

Engineers are, therefore, damned vulnerable to Creationism. The idea of God as a super-engineer feeds their ego, the simplistic explanation that God did it is satisfying, and the gaping holes in Creationism are not even seen. And they get to do some hating."
« Revots... wrote on Sunday, Feb 28 at 11:10 AM »


"...99% of the time?" Liar. Hypocrite. t00l. Coward.
« mike27282 wrote on Sunday, Feb 28 at 10:01 AM »
When it comes to liberals and conservatives, people like revots sure make it easy to tell which side is right.
« Revots... wrote on Sunday, Feb 28 at 09:10 AM »


'listen up', I agree that Ms. Hendrix is a very good writer, as for the rest of your post I've got Two words for you........on second thought Those two words would be removed if I used them so I'll say this; This is a public forum - Anyone can post about Anything they like. Deal. With. It.
« listen up wrote on Saturday, Feb 27 at 12:54 PM »
Ms. Hendrix is a great writer and I don't think she'd appreciate your pointless bickering on her column. Move on and stop fighting. This constant arguing is for children gentleman, even if you do use bigger words. As for your column Ms. Hendrix-- incredible, well spoken and gutsy
« Revots... wrote on Saturday, Feb 27 at 07:16 AM »


Hi PretendIgnore, Pretend ignore much? Oh, I see, now your story is that you preteng ignore 99% of the time. OK Mike, whatever you say....t00l

« Lindsay Pritcking wrote on Saturday, Feb 27 at 12:30 AM »
Well said Mike!
« mike27282 wrote on Thursday, Feb 25 at 07:20 PM »
Okay, maybe I should have been more specific:

There are a lot of ignorant stereotypes directed at engineers. Believing in any of them is foolish.

There are some know it alls that are engineers. There are just as many, if not more, know it alls who aren't engineers. Being an engineer has nothing to do with it.

If most of the engineers that snuffbox has known were know it alls, then based on my experience I have to wonder if snuffbox was the real problem there. There are a lot of engineers out there who aren't know it alls, probably millions of them, but somehow most of the few that snuffbox has worked with were know it alls.

It's too bad that revots doesn't have the mental capacity to understand the difference between a generalization and a stereotype. I've never written "all liberals are ______" or "most liberals are ______." I generalize all the time, just like everyone else.

If an intelligent person called me a fool or a hypocrit, I would be concerned about it. But when a pea brain like revots calls me a fool and a hypocrit, the best I can do is ignore him. And that's exactly what I do 99% of the time.

« Revots... wrote on Thursday, Feb 25 at 03:00 PM »


The Laughable Raging Hypocrite Mike Hughes wrote - "Stereotyping is foolish"...How many people has he 'stereotyped' as 'Liberals' or 'Idiot Liberals' simply because they didn't agree with him? Hughes is The Fool.
« Revots... wrote on Thursday, Feb 25 at 06:50 AM »


How many electrical engineers does it take to change a light bulb?

None. They simply redefine darkness as the industry standard.

...I know - kinda lame. That's the best I could come up with.
« mike27282 wrote on Wednesday, Feb 24 at 09:52 PM »
snuffbox, how many engineers are there in the world? (Probably a few million if you go back 30 years.)

How many of them have you known? (10? 20?)

Stereotyping is foolish.

Are there no repairmen who think they know it all?

Maybe those engineers were geeks, maybe they had no class, maybe they were too cheap, or maybe you were being a pain in the butt and they got tired of dealing with you.

What do you think I did in the Navy? I was an Aviation Electrician's Mate for 10 years. That's a fancy name for "repairman."

Nice response by Meredith Jones! So much for diversity. I guess conformity and mainstream social acceptance are more important for liberals. Wouldn't the world be great if we were all like that? Isn't it nice when liberals prove our point?

« snuffbox1 wrote on Wednesday, Feb 24 at 05:56 PM »
This is more proof that there's a big difference between having money and having class.

Your quote above----Being an engineer---which one of the above categories do you fall into?

Most engineers that I have met in my lifetime seems to be know it alls. You can never tell them anything, because they know it all.

As a repairman for over 30 years, many a time an engineer has given me a disassembled part, because they could not put it back together giving me the reason, "I just didn't have the time to get it back together". Would not admit lack of knowledge. Maybe they were Geeks. Or maybe they just had no class, or were too cheap.
« Meredith Jones wrote on Wednesday, Feb 24 at 05:19 PM »
Awesome. Next column: the nuances of meaning between "geek," "nerd," and "dork."
« mike27282 wrote on Wednesday, Feb 24 at 01:14 PM »
Another excellent column! You're exactly right. I'm an electrical engineer. You can't spell geek without EE :)

The top 10 highest starting salaries by major all include science or engineering:

http://www.naceweb.org/so021710/toppaid/

Science and engineering may not be the highest paying jobs, but the degree gets your foot in the door and puts you in a great position to build a career - there's no limit to where this can lead. Lot's of engineers and scientists have become millionaires by starting their own companies, many others have become managers and executives.

Contrary to what the slackers say, jobs in science and engineering require creativity. It's not all math and inanimate objects. However, these jobs do require dedication and hard work. It's hard to get the degree and it's hard to do the job. Flipping burgers is easy, engineering is not. The high salaries are well earned.

If you put in the effort to get the degree, the odds of you being successful in life are drastically higher than most people. Nothing in life is guaranteed, but you can be sure that you'll never have to beg the government for money (actually the government will do everything it can to take what you've earned), and you'll never have to flip burgers for a living.

Geeks rule!